FREE ESSAY ON ARISTOTLE'S APPROACH TO ETHICS/PLATO'S DIVIDED LINE

ARISTOTLE'S APPROACH TO ETHICS/PLATO'S DIVIDED LINE

Erin E
Philosophy 103
October 9, 1996
Philosophy Take-Home Test
I. PLATO
3) Explain the so-called 'Divided Line'. What do the different levels mean? How does this
apply to
ethics? How does this apply to Knowledge, perception, and/or awareness? Explain in depth
and detail.
Plato's 'Divided Line' is a model indicating not only levels of knowledge, but basically
levels of
everything. It is divided into four levels and two sides. The left side consists of ways
we know, become
aware of, and perceive things, while the right side consists of the objects of knowledge,
awareness, and
perception. The bottom half includes those things in the physical realm and the top half
includes those
things in the spiritual and intellectual realm. The highest point in the physical realm
is the sun, and the
highest point in the spiritual realm is the form of the good and beautiful, both of which
are essentially
impossible to reach. 
The different levels mean different things. On the lowest level, the left side is made up
of our
imagination, perception, and conjecture. The right side is made up of shadows and
mirages. The next
level up, on the left, is where we believe something because we see it. The right side of
this level is
where we find all physical things. At the top of the physical realm before entering the
spiritual realm, is
the sun. The next level up is the lowest level in the spiritual realm. The left side of
this level includes
thinking from hypotheses, while the right side includes objects of math and science. The
top level in
Plato's model contains true knowledge and dialectical thinking on the left. The rite
contains all forms
and ideas. The topmost point, the forms of the good and beautiful, is the ultimate goal
of human
happiness, or eudaimonia. These non-physical forms are the ultimate reality, the ideal
perfect model of
all that exists. 
These different levels apply to knowledge, perception, awareness, and ethics in the same
way. 
For each of these things, the higher one goes in the model, the higher one goes in any of
these particular
areas. For example, regarding different levels of knowledge, the lowest level is on the
bottom and the
highest level is on top. Therefore, the closer one gets to the top of the model, the more
knowledge one has 
Eskildsen, p.2
and vice-versa. The same holds true for the other areas, as well, and they are all
related to each other. 
Using knowledge in another example, the higher level of knowledge one reaches, the higher
one's ethical
standards are, as well. Because of these relationships, Plato's 'Divided Line' relates to
all areas of life. 
II. ARISTOTLE
1) Explain fully Aristotle's approach to Ethics. What is the goal of the ethical life?
What type of soul is
capable of realizing the good life? How do we go about accomplishing this goal? What are
the possible
lifestyle choices we may lead? Are any of these conducive to leading the good life?
The goal of the ethical life, according to Aristotle, is good. All human activity is
directed toward
this good, the highest of which is Eudaimonia. There are two kinds of good, intrinsic and
instrumental. 
Intrinsic goods are those which are good in and of themselves. The only thing that is
completely intrinsic
is happiness, or Eudaimonia. Instrumental goods are those which are good only because
they are used for
some other thing or purpose. Money is the most obvious instrumental good, as it is used
to obtain other
goods. 
Any individual with a virtuous soul is capable of realizing the good life. One must live
with
moral and intellectual virtues, excellences, and high standards to accomplish this goal.
There are three
lifestyles one may lead: the vulgar, the political, or the contemplative. The vulgar
lifestyle is based on
instant gratification. Goods are simply pleasures one enjoys immediately and temporarily.
This lifestyle
is guaranteed to fail in the quest for Eudaimonia. The political lifestyle in one in
which happiness is
determined by honor achieved. There are two types of honors one can obtain in the
political life, the real
and the bogus. Bogus honors are simply to gain status in society and could be bought, but
real honors are
awards for doing good and helping others. While politics itself is the study of the good,
one could easily
disgrace oneself and become ostracized from the community. The contemplative lifestyle is
one based
upon speculation and reflection into one's own life. This lifestyle is ethical and is the
best way to guide
one towards the good life and true happiness.