FREE ESSAY ON POLICE BRUTALITY

POLICE BRUTALITY

Racism and police brutality goes hand in hand, and causes a major concern in today's
society, in the United States. On March 3, 1991 in California, Rodney King an African
American, was pulled over after a high-speed chase, and after stopping was beaten by four
white police officers (Worsnop 635). Tracy Brock also an African American was arrested in
Manhattan in November of 1986. An officer smashed his head through a plate glass window,
when Brock refused to go into the officer's lunchroom (Police Brutality and Excessive
Force in the New York City Police Department 14). Ki Tae Kim a Korean grocer was
assaulted when he was accused of passing a counterfeit bill. He was punched in the face,
his head was slammed into the counter, and the officer also subjected him to racial slurs
(Police Brutality and Excessive Force in the New York City Police Department 17). Marcos
Maldonado a Latino grocer was mistaken for a suspect after an armed robbery to his store.
He was handcuffed, thrown to the floor, repeatedly kicked, and beaten with the officer's
nightstick (Police Brutality and Excessive Force in the New York City Police Department
17). Abner Louima a Haitian immigrant was arrested outside a dance club in Brooklyn, and
was brutally assaulted when he arrived at the police station. Volpe a long time police
officer was accused of shoving a plunger into Louima's rectum so far that his bladder and
intestines were lacerated. Then he shoved the plunger into Louima's mouth and broke his
teeth (Steinback 8). These are just a few examples of the people who were affected of
police brutality, and racism. There are five stages through which force can progress and
lead to brutality: Verbal persuasion, unarmed physical force, force using non-lethal
weapons, force using impact weapons and deadly force, which most of the officers
mentioned before fell into this stage. The deadly force stage is only to be used only
when an officer's life or another person's life is in danger. The deadly force stage
should be terminated, if not made illegal in the United States. By having the "deadly
force" stage, by law you are permitting someone to commit a murder, and basically saying
that it is just. In many of the cases stated before these guidelines were violated, and
stronger action was used on the citizen than necessary. The officers who were accused in
these cases were charged with only minor offenses, and some were charged with nothing at
all. Stronger action should have been enforced on the police officers that committed
these crimes. All of these victims mentioned are from minority groups, and were harmed by
white New York City police officers. In less than four years fifty -five people have died
while in being in police custody, in the New York City Police Department (Police
Brutality and Excessive Force in the New York City Police Department 8). This number
compared to earlier statistics seems to be low, but still seems extremely high, for the
rules and regulations the officers are supposed to be following. Should the Federal
Government increase the punishment on law enforcement officials who brutally hurt
citizens that are in custody, or under arrest?
Many law enforcement officials appear to have a tough exterior towards crime, but are
very sensitive to crime on the inside. Police officers build up negative feelings towards
certain races, sexes, or religions. Officers tend to get the impression that if one or a
few people treat them with disrespect, than other people of that same sex, race, or
religion will treat the officer in the same way. It is has proven that less than five
percent of all cops are the "bad element," but if they other ninety five percent stand
around and do nothing, then that is where the real problem lies (Worsnop 636). Another
cause of police brutality and misconduct is the amount of stress that is put upon the law
enforcement official. According to Robert Scully who is the president of the National
Association of Police Organizations in Detroit, "There obviously has to be some kind of
stress factor at work in brutality cases because stress is an inherent part of
policing."(Worsnop 636). A survey done by the Washington Post exposed a comparable local
pattern of the sixty one police misconduct cases heard in 1990 by the District of
Columbia Civilian Complaint review board. It has been discovered that excessive force was
used only in eighteen out of the sixty-one cases that were reported. It has also been
found that judges and juries side with police officers and not with the citizen. (Police
Brutality and Excessive Force in the New York City Police Department 7).
Law enforcement officials who are accused of police brutality are required to attend a
civil court hearing with a judge and a jury present. Most times the jury will find the
officers not guilty, or guilty of a lesser crime. This is true in the case of the officer
who used an illegal chokehold on Anthony Baez; a twenty eight-year old Puerto Rican,
after Baez's football hit the patrol car. Baez was killed due to the force of the
chokehold, but the officer was found not guilty (Contreras 30). Police officers are also
required to go to a class that reteaches them how to act appropriately in an arrest.
These classes last for between one week and two weeks depending on the state. This class
is done on the officer's own time and they do not receive pay for attending. This is
required before the officer is allowed back on the street. The classes are usually held
at night and seem pretty boring and useless to the officers. Most feel they did not
commit a wrongdoing and that they are innocent.
There are many ways to curb police brutality, and by implementing a new law, brutality
should decrease. Right now officers know that there are laws dealing with etiquette
during an arrest, but many don't bother to apply what they know, and let physical
strength, and force take over. The federal government needs to enact a law that will make
officers think twice before using a nightstick unnecessarily, punching or kicking a
person, or using excessive force. The law should read, " Any officer accused by a citizen
and two other witnesses of using excessive force, will be suspended without pay for
thirty days, for a first time offense. For a repeated offense the officer will be
subjected to a court hearing in which a jury will decide his/her fate." The jury could
decide on another suspension for the officer, or as heavy as being permanently let go
from the force. Another proposal for guarding against police brutality is by rewarding
officers with raises and promotions. Police departments should give thought to honoring
"exemplary service to the community" awards once a year. Private businesses and social
groups could provide cash rewards for commendable behavior. Each year there could be a
ceremony in the town hall of the local village, and the business that donated the money
could present the check and a plaque to the recipient. 
The preferred policy that I would like to enact would be allowing law enforcement
officials get rewarded for long-term service and notable behavior. This will teach them
that by thinking each situation though, and by taking each with a grain of salt, they
don't need excessive force to get cooperation. If local businesses were willing to donate
at least ten dollars apiece, and only one reward was given a year it could really promote
a positive influence over the police department. This would motivate officers to act
accordingly, and this policy could easily be enacted with the help of the police
department. In areas where crime rates are high often times so are stress rates. Police
departments should offer stress management clinics that are mandatory to attend, once or
twice a month. It will allow for police officers to share stores about how they managed
their stress, and explain situations in which they failed. An intangible result would be
in low crime areas should this still be a mandatory practice, and what if local
businesses didn't want to participate? If a stress clinic was actually implemented who
would run it? And would they have to pay someone to do it? 
The likeness of implementing the recommended preferred policy is pretty likely because it
costs very little money, and in some states it is already being considered. The money
comes from donations and you could use some of it to by a plaque to display in the police
department. There are many active players who think very strongly about police brutality.
James Fyfe is strongly against police brutality and states that, "Police practice has
changed after a decade of long term turmoil." (Worsnop 635). At the Ella Baker Center for
Human Rights a community group handles all police brutality cases that are subjected to
court hearings in that state (Davidson 49). President Clinton has announced a forty-seven
million-dollar program to strengthen police integrity. Twenty million alone would be used
for expanding an officers integrity and ethics (Davidson 51). Laurie Levenson is standing
up for all police brutality victims, not just those of minorities. She said, "We were
naive to think the Rodney King case would solve the problem of police abuse. It's a much
bigger problem than one case.... You have to take these issues very seriously."(Goldman
A1+). Rita Leitner whose son was a victim of police brutality speaks out, and is very
active in preventing police brutality. She stands strong because her son was permanently
injured in the hands of those who are supposed to protect. The players that are mentioned
here are all against police brutality. It was pretty difficult to find players that
thought brutality was not important and was not an issue. The prince analysis done on
this issue shows an eighty three percent chance of being implemented. This is a highly
likely rate of implementation.
Police Brutality in the United States and around the world needs to be totally abolished
to protect the citizens, and the police officers.