Free Essays, Free Research Papers, Free Book Reports and Free Term Papers
Great Essay Free Essays, Free Research Papers,
Free Book Reports and Free Term Papers

FREE ESSAY ON WIPING THE SLATE CLEAN:DESCARTES

College Term Papers - Instant Download

(sponsored links)

Rene Descartes
An analysis of the contribution of Rene Descartes's work on the history of philosophy. -- 3,012 words; MLA

On the Nature of the Supreme Deity - Descartes and Hume
Review of the arguments of Descartes and Hume for the existence of God. Descartes' argument from definition and Humes' teleological argument (argument from design) are examined. -- 1,575 words;

Descartes: A Thinking Thing
An analysis of Descartes statement that he is a "thinking thing". -- 1,350 words;

Rene Descartes
An overview of the ideas and theories of the philosopher, Rene Descartes. -- 1,787 words; APA

Descartes and 'I'
An analysis of Rene Descartes' approach to the knowledge of the 'I'. -- 1,660 words; MLA

Click here for more essays on WIPING THE SLATE CLEAN:DESCARTES

WIPING THE SLATE CLEAN:DESCARTES

One of Descartes earliest arguments discusses the law of non-contradiction. In his
reasoning, everyone has the same amount of good sense and access to the truth when they
are born into this world, yet people obviously disagree on many issues. The reason for
this fact is that people do not follow the same line of reasoning because they do not
take the same things into consideration as a result of different life experiences. In
Descartes law of non-contradiction there is only one truth for every question, so when
two people disagree on something, one of them has to be right. A good example of this
would be if there were two people. One thinks red is the best color and the other person
believes blue is the best color. For Descartes, one or both of these people must be wrong
because there is only one truth. His task is to look at this situation and locate who
holds the truth. If certain guidelines could be established by which everyone could come
to conclusions, it would be possible to obtain this truth, and we would no longer have
diversity in opinions.
Descartes makes this point in reference to Philosophy when he says, "seeing that it has
been cultivated for many centuries by the most excellent minds that have ever lived and
that, nevertheless, there still is nothing in it about which there is not some
dispute..." To him, this means that a primary goal of philosophy, finding truth, has not
been achieved. He sets forth to change that by implementing a new method of philosophy.
He gathered from this that if everyone disagrees, everything that people believe must be
unsure, and therefore a poor basis for truth seeking. He comes to this realization when
he says, "I deemed everything that was merely probable to be well-nigh false." Descartes
new method promoted that, to find truth, you must purge everything based upon anything
unsure.
Descartes wants to strip himself of all beliefs, including everything he has learned and
sensed. Our senses sometimes deceive us, and it only makes sense to choose never to trust
in something that has failed us in the past. "...book learning, at least the kind whose
reasonings are merely probable and that do not have any demonstrations, having been
composed and enlarged little by little from the opinions of many different persons, does
not draw nearly so close to the truth as the simple reasoning that a man of good sense
can naturally make about the things he encounters." He believed knowledge gained from
sensation or from books is not clearly true, Descartes needed to find a way to develop a
new belief system. He described this new method in four rules, which if obeyed, would
constitute a satisfactory belief system and eliminate all disagreement. 
The first rule states that one should only accept as true what he sees clearly and
distinctly as true. Nothing with any possibility of falsity can be included. This brings
up an interesting point. Is there anything that is so absolutely true? It would be very
difficult to have something be thought of as true to everyone, but that is the job
Descartes imposed upon himself. The second rule says it is necessary to break down all
problems into as many pieces as possible so it is easier to solve them clearly. The third
rule states he will start with the simplest and easiest way to understand objects and
move up to more complex issues. The fourth and final rule states that he must
periodically check his work, making sure that there is no possibility that he could
exclude anything. This is the method by which he plans to establish indisputable truth. 
Though he proposes we wipe the slate clean, Descartes claims that he is not a skeptic
because skepticism ends in doubt while his goal is to firmly establish truth. Descartes
is a methodical doubter who uses doubt as a tool to establish truth, so he does not
simply propose that we abandon out beliefs without a plan. His four rules are the method
by which he proposes to rebuild our beliefs. He argues that if you are going to throw
away all of your past experiences, you must be prepared. Some kind of plan to start over
should be in tacked before you throw everything out. He uses this example, "before
beginning to rebuild the house where one is living, simply to pull it down, and to make
provision for materials and architects or to train oneself in architecture..." It is
necessary to know exactly what to do when you purge past experiences. According to
Descartes "it is also necessary to be provided with someplace else where one can live
comfortably while working on it." 
Descartes must find a way of acting, provisional morality, to hold onto temporarily until
he finds the truth. He says he needs to be conservative, following the customs of the
place where he is living. Descartes also states that he will be resolute in his actions.
Whatever he does, whether it is wrong or right, he will follow through with it until the
end. He will also conquer himself rather than the world. He is willing to accept and
conform himself to events. Also, until he finds truth, he decided to be content in being
a philosopher. Descartes states earlier that philosophy is speaking with probability and
being admired. He then says that all probable things are false, which would make all
sciences, philosophy among them, false. In addition to his provisional code of morals,
Descartes also agreed to make no long-term commitments, choosing for the meantime to hold
on to the given truths of the Catholic Church.
When he applies all four rules of his method he is able to establish his first principles
upon which he proposes to build the truth. His first principle is, "I think, therefore I
am." This one truth is the only thing, which he can understand as true without using any
preconceptions. Using a dream analogy, he asks how we know if we are awake or asleep.
Dreams do not follow a logical chain of events, and the dreamer is not always aware that
they are asleep. Descartes states that, even if he is dreaming, he must exist for the
simple fact that his mind is thinking. Having established one pure first principle using
his method, the rest of Descartes Discourse on Method is spent in re-establishing ideas
such as God, science, and the material world as truths based upon reasonable arguments
instead of human impressions. 

Use the Search box at the top to find Term Papers for Sale by keywords or browse Free Essays page by page
(sorted alphabetically by Essay Title):

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
For college-level Term Papers, Essays, Research Papers and Book Reports, please go to the Term Papers for Sale Website


This Free Essays Web Site, is Copyright © 2008, Essay Express. All rights reserved.




Partner websites: Interior Decor Art :: Immigration Lawyer Toronto :: Laser Clinic Toronto :: Original Abstract Paintings :: Learn Violin in Thornhill :: Learn Violin in Toronto :: Buy used Yamaha piano in Toronto